Why I do not support Andrew Yang anymore

Andrew Yang is currently running for mayor of New York, and I have no interest in him, but if he is elected, I would not be too happy, so I write an article to oppose him.

Of course, if it is another Democratic candidate, like Bill de Blasio, it will be even worse than Andrew Yang. But in general, the Democrats will never do a good job in New York, so thank goodness if they could maintain the status quo.

This is very sad. After all, I was a big fan of Andrew Yang. I wrote so many articles and donated a lot of money to him. He was the only person with a Chinese face, how excited I was. Now I don't even want to look at this person, and there is no other decent Chinese. Maybe someday I can only rely on myself!

Why did he disappoint me? This is partly because of his own problems, and partly because I learned more about the Democratic Party when I followed him.

Regarding himself, the main thing is this: Since Andrew Yang dropped out from the election, he has become a diehard follower of the Democratic Party, ignoring their ultra-left policies, and there is no longer what he said before "not left, not right, forward". This person who once advertised that he is not a politician turns out to another politician, an opportunist, and a liar; in addition, there is one more thing: because Georgia is in the old-fashioned American gentleman’s heart and did not require to live for a full period of time before being a state citizen. In the recent election, Andrew Yang called on people to temporarily move to Georgia to participate in the election. Although this is not unconstitutional, it has revealed Andrew Yang’s riffraff spirit and low-quality citizenship. He deleted his Twit afterwards, but I was surprised when I saw it. In addition, his nonsense as a commentator on CNN and the appearance of begging for a job with the Biden administration is even more horrible.

The more important reason is the basis of his UBI, which is automation eliminates work. Obviously, the unemployment rate in the United States was very low before the epidemic. How could there be no jobs? Isn't this talking nonsense with his eyes open? I previously supported UBI because I opposed the welfare system. I think UBI is slightly better than welfare, but later I discovered that this is the same as the welfare policy of the Democratic Party. It has not only the well-known problems, but also a contradiction I found out with the immigration policy of the Democratic Party. I'll talk about it later.

Since Andrew Yang has stopped mentioning "not left, not right, forward", I will not talk about him alone, but explain why I oppose generally the Democratic Party that he identifies with. In a nutshell, the Democratic Party is all lies:

First of all, the Democrats emphasize unity but do their utmost to divide. President Obama of the Democratic Party once said: There is no liberal America and a conservative America, there is only one (united) United States of America". But what the Democratic Party does every day is to emphasize ethnic struggle and even class struggle. What they do are all related to divide, not unity at all.

Second, the Democrats emphasize fraternity but hate people who have different ideas from their own. They are eager to get rid of others and treat them as class enemies. It has the Lei Feng spirit of "autumn wind sweeping the fallen leaves". They can spread the bloody heads of their opponents in the media, but easily say that a certain sentence of the opponent is hateful language.

Third, the Democrats have the word "democracy" in its name, but they emphasize political correctness, that is, people cannot offend minorities; cannot offend women; cannot offend gender irregularities; cannot offend holders of different beliefs or political opinions. What is "offensive" here is defined by them. Their rights cannot be offended, but they can feel at ease offending the rights of others.

Fourth, the Democrats emphasize the elimination of discrimination but extremely discriminates against people who have different ideas from its own, especially ridiculing opponents for not reading. This makes me feel funny. Where do they get such a strong self-confidence? Is reading more articles in the New York Times with obvious orientation persuading or listening to the same mainstream media a few times is the proof of high learning? Furthermore, the Democrats emphasized giving more opportunities to certain ethnic minorities, but it has done great harm to other ethnic minorities, especially Asians. Isn't this also a form of discrimination?

Finally, let me emphasize again: The Democrat Party treats the poor and illegal immigrants as pigs.

Although the Democrat Party is led by elites, such as big bosses of big technology companies, big Hollywood directors and stars, famous university professors, and big writers, it claims to be petitioning for the poor. This seems a bit contradictory and funny, but you will understand that this is not surprising as I explain below.

How does the Democrat Party appeal to the poor by raising them as pigs: first they feed them with the welfare pig food, second, let them live in slum houses that are as dirty as pigsty, and third, let them not work like pigs. This includes cultivating their willingness and skills to not work, forgetting their labor instincts, and also enacting laws to prevent them from working. For example, if they work, there will be no welfare pig food, or raising the minimum wage so that employers can’t hire them. 

What is their purpose in doing this? It is to get the dependence of the poor on them, and the ultimate goal is to get their votes. Whenever there is an election, the Democrat Party will come to promise more benefits, that is, more food for pigs, and send buses to take them to vote, or simply send the votes to their homes to show who to vote for and then take them away. But whether it is black or white Democrat leaders, for decades, holding the votes of the poor, they have not improved the lives and environment of the poor. The slums of major cities are still the same, and people are terrified when they pass by. There are good areas because they were once governed by non-Democrats, such as New York, which has become better through the governance of Giuliani and Bloomberg, who was not a Democrat at the time. When David Norman Dinkins of the Democratic Party was in power, New York was also dirty, broken and dangerous. After that, the Democratic Party's De Blasio came to change New York back to what it was like in the days of David Norman Dinkins.

Not only that, the Democratic Party is also doing various things to make the lives of the poor people worse and worse. What are the things?

There are many things, such as the Democratic Party’s constant demand for an increase in the minimum wage that I mentioned earlier. In the past, employers could hire a poor person to work. Although the salary may not be much, it is self-reliant after all, and if the market is good, workers can also shop around and find higher-paying jobs. Now that the minimum wage has increased, small employers have gone bankrupt, and big bosses such as Amazon have used high-tech to improve efficiency and use less manpower. The poor will no longer find good jobs. So Amazon’s Bezos firmly supports raising the minimum wage. He can afford it, but the shopkeepers on the main street of the towns have suffered.

But the most important thing the Democratic Party hurts the poor is their immigration policy, because the introduction of illegal immigrants makes the local poor completely lose their competitiveness.

The Democratic Party advocates that there is no resistance against illegal immigrants and encourages the influx of illegal immigrants. This will inevitably make low-level work wages very low. Even if they lobby to raise the minimum wage, illegal immigrants will not enjoy this minimum wage. Anyway, they are illegal.  Poor people cannot participate in the competition for these jobs because they have the same benefits as pig food, plus there are restrictions on not being able to continue to receive pig food benefits if they work.

In this way, the existing poor people within the country cannot work, continue to be pigs by the Democratic Party, and their qualifications to be pigs are ensured.

Then, the Democratic Party allowed these newly arrived illegal immigrants to obtain citizenship, receive benefits, and obtain the qualifications for them to be pigs. New immigrants live very poorly, but they give birth to more poor children and their family depends on the Democratic Party.

Then the Democratic Party will introduce more illegal immigrants, that is, for them, more people can be regarded as their pigs.

The Democratic Party knows that they do such bad things, but why do they still do it? Because they can only be in power by relying on the votes of the poor. In other words, they base their interest in power on top of the poor people, on the condition that the poor can never stand up.

How did the Democratic Party do this?

First, fool the people with the beautiful sentiments of humanitarianism. For example, illegal immigrants are working so hard, and only they are willing to do such hard work under the scorching sun. But in fact, humanitarianism and illegal immigration are two different concepts, or the concept of inverted cause and effect. If there were no illegal immigrants, would there still be illegal immigrants working under the scorching sun? Will there be illegal immigrants whose family are separated? No. It is the immigration policy of the Democratic Party that created illegal immigrants working under the scorching sun and illegal immigrants whose family are separated.

Second: spread the lie that no one is willing to do these low-level jobs. If there were no competition from illegal immigrants and the temptation and restriction of welfare benefits like pig food, some citizens of the country will be willing and able to engage in these low-income jobs. If it is true that the wages are too low and there are not enough people willing to engage in this job, it is entirely possible to adjust wages through the market. For example, in California, a large number of farmers and workers are needed during the strawberry harvest. If the market is used to increase the prices of agricultural products so that farmers have the money to pay higher wages, or the government provides certain subsidies to increase wages, more domestic poor people will be able to work. Here, it is not a direct increase of the minimum wage, but a higher wage to attract more human resources when the market needs labor, so as to make the market more effective. However, the entry of illegal immigrants has distorted the market mechanism and made the market unable to operate normally. When the California strawberry farm needed labor the most, how many domestic poor people wanted to find such a job? No, they would rather take drugs, drink, and wander on the streets of New York and San Francisco than do this kind of work. In contrast, in China during the reform and opening-up period, many farmers went out to work, which created the rapid development of China's economy. Chinese farmers are working hard and may not be treated fairly, but what I want to say here is that the US welfare policy gives the poor no chance to change their destiny, and it is not beneficial to the country, and it causes serious social problems. .

Third, the so-called cheapness of illegal immigrants is short-sighted and extremely deceptive. This is because although the wages of illegal immigrants are low, the social problems they cause are far-reaching. On the one hand, after entering the United States, illegal immigrants need Americans to pay far more  than this low wage; in other words, the taxpayer will pay for the benefits that employers get from illegal immigrants. Second, and more importantly, the entry of illegal immigrants has made local poor people uncompetitive, thus losing their willingness and ability to work, and the conflicts with the country and other classes have become increasingly serious, such as conflicts between races, including BLM movement, and various incidents of beating, smashing and stealing. Some black resistance leaders have threatened to launch a violent revolution. On the other hand, drug usage is rampant with the white poor people, and the tension with the black people is intensifying.

On the one hand, the Democratic Party treats the poor as pigs that provide votes, and on the other hand, it introduces a large number of immigrants to grab the jobs of the poor. The contradiction and hypocrisy here are just as that in the Chinese proverb of the can kill anything spear attacking the can shield anything  shield. They say there are not enough jobs on the job market for the poor, so benefits must be paid. What's more, politician Yang Anze said that automation makes people out of work and needs to get UBI. But on the other hand, they also say that immigrants are waiting at the border, so quickly let them in. Since there are no work, why let them in? Send UBI? Send benefits?

George Cannan, the designer of the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, once said: “The inability of any society to resist immigration, the inability to find other solutions to the problem of employment at the lower, more physical, and menial levels of the economic process, is a serious weakness, and possibly even a fatal one, in any national society. The fully healthy society would find ways to meet those needs out of its own resources.”

Therefore, what the Democratic Party has done is tantamount to drawing wolves into the house and subverting the country. Of course, they were meant to subvert the so-called "white supremacy" country and build the "politically correct" country they wanted.

There is no other way to change the status quo in the United States but to make the poor have the desire and opportunity to work again. The most important point is to strictly safeguard the border and block more illegal immigrants. Second, revise the welfare system to encourage work.

Of course again, the Democratic Party will not do this. They will let in more illegal immigrants and enlarge the pigsty so that they can have a bigger vote.